Friday 7 December 2012

Finland vs. Rep Moldova




This comparison will be between Finland and Republic of Moldova. Finland is the peninsular country I will look into this week and also the more developed country between these two.

In Europe, Finland is known as one of the most “green” countries and this is why here, the concentration of air pollutants is lower in Finland and there are only a few cases when the values from this country rush up to the roof. However, there is an important amount of O3 and PM 10 in the atmosphere especially in the urban areas. So, the O3 concentration could occur during the wintertime conditions because of the domestic heating and the increase on PM 10 is the result of the springtime dust periods as are they known in the region. Also, we must not ignore the transboundary pollution which is an important fact in whole Europe. What should be a concern is that in these springtime events, the daily values for PM10 are sometimes higher than the EU limit, so a long exposure of the population could cause some health issue. All the information regarding Finland’s air quality come from the Finnish Meteorological Institute, where real time air quality maps can be found.

Even though is a green country, Finland has its issues and NOX is one of those chapters where there are some problems similarly to other developed EU members. In certain street canyons in downtown Helsinki with the highest traffic volumes, the annual limit value may be exceeded. 

Despite being a developed country, Finland has a particular behaviour for all that means energy and transport. Because its population has adopted a less aggressive approach in the transport and energy areas, the pollution that results from these two activities has nothing to do with GHG, but the result is in other kind of pollution.

An interesting document is the Informative Inventory Report report which summarizes the evolution of pollution between 1990 and 2007 and makes some projections about how the emissions values for NOX, NH3, NMVOC, SOX , PM10 AND PM2.5 will evolve in 2020 and 2050.

According to Statistic Finlandat the end of 2012 Finland will be able to reach the value of emissions from 1990, target which has been set by the Kyoto Protocol.

A widely accepted idea is that in future  the PM values will become  a higher concern than the classic gases emissions.

On the other hand, Republic of Moldova must deal with some serious problems.  For this country, the most important resources are the soil and the climate but these are in danger to disappear as a result of climate change. Without a real active industry and major cities, Rep. of Moldova is a “victim” transboundary pollution. The economy of this country is actually based on agriculture and every shift and change in climate is felt in productivity and of course in GDP.

According to the Moldavian StateHydrometeorological Service there were recorded 9 droughts between 1990 and 2007. In addition, in 2007 was recorded the most severe drought which affected over three quarters of the Moldavian territory, drought that of course had serious consequence in economy as well.

IPCC’s 4th report was used as well for projections for Rep. of Moldova and according to National Human Development Reportfor 2009-2010 , Climate Change in Moldova, and the table underneath shows how precipitation and temperature will vary for A2 an B2 scenarios.


So, the Ministry of Environment is quite involved and has under its order the SHS, the State Hydrometeorological Service with 17 holding quality monitoring stations.

The Ministry of the Environment (MoE) plays a key role in environmental observations and data collection whereas the main network of environmental quality monitoring stations is maintained generally by the State Hydrometeorological Service (SHS).

The air pollution in this country has as major sources in the urban areas the traffic and the construction industry, and in the rural areas the important sources are central heating, bakeries and wineries because Rep. of Moldova has large areas covered by vineyards, due the soil and temperatures.

As in all Europe, the transboundary air pollution manifests through acid rainfall, the result of SO2 AND NO2 emissions, emissions that come from thermal power stations, large industrial enterprises, burning coal and other fossil fuels and of course transport.

The water pollution on the other hand is a stringent problem here and the river Bis that goes through Chisinau (the capital) is one of the most contaminated riversfrom Rep. of Moldova  For this area the air and water pollution is somehow connected because the major causes that lead to this are:
  • the emissions from the chemical factories that contaminate both the air because of the non-updated filters and soil dues the infiltration;
  • waste burning factories;
  • chemical treatment of the agricultural crops and forest areas against diseases and pests.

This video shows one of the pollution sources from Bic. I apologize that is no English translation but I believe that the images speak for theirself.
Source: Youtube

The Russian influence can be seen through the large-scale use of DDT , a very toxic substance that was banned in all the other European countries after a huge number of test came up with the result that using of DDT has dangerous effects on human health and environment.
In 1992, Rep of Moldova signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and in 2003 the Kyoto Protocol and the Capacity Building for Improving the Quality of Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Europe/CIS region.

 The policy of environmental protection, air protection includes a law from 1997, Law nr.1442-XII from 27.12.1997  which has as major objectives: preserve and enhance air quality and prevent and reduce the harmful effects of physical, chemical, biological, radioactive and other factors on atmosphere.
 

The latest documents about climate change mitigations that this country recognizes are “Financing Energy Efficiency Investments for Climate Change Mitigation” 2008–2012 and Moldova Energy Conservation and Greenhouse Gases Emission Reduction” 2006–2016. 

Moreover, David Maddisona and Katrin Rehdanzb conclude in their article from Ecological Economics, that in 1996, Rep. Moldova was the least satisfied country.





  




No comments:

Post a Comment