Sunday 28 October 2012

Something else


This week an article about aviation and meteorology caught my eye. Although it is from 1992 it makes a point and has pioneered research about the topic. So we cannot talk about aviation and flight without referring to safety. In aviation, the main purpose is to ensure its safety by preventing the premises and events that could occur during the flight.


Furthermore, for civil aviation, the safety is linked to three factors: the human factor, the technical one and the environmental one. For example, the environmental factor is based on the meteorological situation, the ornithological situation and the aerial situation. So this environmental factor is the one who can enhance or mitigate the amount of material or human losses.
The meteorological situation is the environmental component that could influence the security of flight when some dangerous phenomena occur: fog, blizzards, dust storms, atmospheric turbulence, thunderstorms, storms etc.

Depending on where the phenomena occur they are classified in: 
  • at the aerodrome: 
    • thunderstorms, storm, tempest, hail, glazed frost, mist , ice buildup on the ground or other phenomena that reduce visibility below the minimum scale set for the aerodrome or crew;
    • the lower limit height of clouds is under the acceptable boundary set for the aerodrome; 
    • the ground wind’s velocity is higher than the standard values for takeoff / landing for different types of planes or could affect the ground equipment from the airport.
  • in areas and flight trajectories :
    •          thunderstorms and CB developed clouds that cannot be passed by;
    • strong icing that cannot be removed by defrosting equipment;
    • strong turbulence which jeopardizes the safety of the flight;
    • jet streams with velocity of over 150km/h.




So besides the possible human error, the meteorological component of what is known as ”flight safety” is important and is a field that needs the very best experts.


Saturday 20 October 2012

Greece vs.The Netherlands


The first comparison between developed and less developed countries starts with Netherlands and Greece, countries which differ both geographically and economically. The first one is a continental country with an area of 41.526 km² and a more developed economy than the Greek’s which has a larger territory 131.990 km² and a historical legacy as well. The Greek economy is less developed and is relying only on tourism in some regions. Although both of them are EU members, the idea that they are develop equally is based on a false presumption. The differences are not only economical but geographical and social too. If Netherlands is a continental country, Greece on the other hand is a peninsular and insular country which leads to another type of development. Being part of the same EU system, a major law in environmental protection is “Environment-related indicators 2008”, European Commission which is reliable both for climate change and different kinds of pollution.

The environmental issues are not the same because the interest in protecting the environment is also different. So, for the Netherlands the major issue is the territorial water pollution when, for Greece it is the industrial smog and the exhaust of gas emissions in the metropolitan area of Athens.
Similarly to the rest of Europe, the rest of environmental problems like exceeded emissions for SO2, NOX, O3, CO, C6H6 and particulate matter PM10 and PM2.5 are common here as well.

Ammonia (NH3) values between 1990-2008 and the target for 2010 Gothenburg protocol; Source:http://www.eea.europa.eu/ 

If in Netherlands there were some political tensions because of the pollution in the Northern Sea, Greece is one of the first 50 countries that contributes to the global pollution with industrial carbon – in 1992 it was on the 37th place with 73.8 million tones and a level of 7.25 per capita.

Nitric oxide values between 1990-2007 and the target for 2010 Gothenburg protocol; Source:http://www.eea.europa.eu/ 


Analyzing the information that EEA offers us, it becomes obvious that the interest and the amount of money is definitely higher in the developed countries than in the eastern Europe or Balkan countries. 
GHG's values linked to climate change; Source:http://www.eea.europa.eu/ 

Bibliography: 



Friday 12 October 2012

Brace yourselves the posts are coming!


Start a blog they said, it will be fun they said! Well, we will see how fun it will be in the end. However, this blog should reflect how the climate and climate change are perceived in UK and also in other places in Europe, that are differently developed economically and culturally. Thus it will be quite challenging but it will work after all.

So my first post will be about how I perceived ‘the Island’ and how on the continent things are quite different. Hope you will enjoy it and you will not be so harsh on me. :D

Continental why’s:
  • Why are not there any switches in houses and you should use a wire to turn on the light?
  • Why are there two water taps instead of one so you can adjust the water temperature?
  • Why should you walk on left and not on right?
  • Why do people enjoy standing in queue?
  • Why is beer so expensive?
  • Why do not people talk all the time about the Queen?
  • Why aren’t the streets crowded with punkers?
  • Why does everyone enjoy the rain and the people who use umbrellas are mostly from overseas?
  • Why are not all the cabs black?
  • And where did the red old telephone cabins disappear?